The Impact of Digital Games on Students’ Willingness to Communicate in a Flipped Classroom Context
Article Sidebar
PDF downloads: 55
XML-Crossref downloads: 6
Crossref Citations: 1
Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction: The ability to use language for communicative purposes is significant in learning English as a foreign language. The present study investigated the effect of digital games on intermediate EFL learners’ Willingness to Communicate (WTC) in a flipped classroom context.
Methodology: Of 90 female intermediate EFL learners, 60 participants were selected based on their performance on an Oxford Placement Test. The subjects were then divided into an experimental and a control group. After that, the participants in the two groups filled out the WTC questionnaire as a pre-test. Following that, in the experimental group, the researcher used Fun Easy Learning Game Software in a flipped instruction mode to instruct 50 vocabulary items that were identified as unknown to the learners. As for the control group, the learners followed the conventional method of instruction and thus followed the syllabus of the institute. The learners in this group were instructed on the same 50 vocabulary items but did not receive any content in a flipped instruction mode via games. The treatment lasted 10 sessions, and at the end, the participants in both groups were given the WTC questionnaire as a post-test.
Results: The results of statistical analysis indicated that the use of digital games significantly affected intermediate students’ WTC in a flipped classroom context. Learners in the experimental group outperformed their counterparts in the control group.
Conclusion: Based on the findings, EFL teachers are encouraged to employ digital games in a flipped instruction mode to enhance EFL learners’ WTC.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Aghlara, L., & Hadidi Tamjid, N. (2011). The effect of digital games on Iranian vocabulary retention in foreign language acquisition. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29(6), 552- 560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.275
Alemi, M., Daftarifard, P., & Pashmforoosh, R. (2011). The impact of language anxiety and language proficiency on WTC in EFL
context. Cross-Cultural Communication, 7(3), 150-166. http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/j.ccc.1923670020110703.152
Aliakbari, M., Kamangar, M., & Khany, R. (2016). Willingness to communicate in English among Iranian EFL students. English Language Teaching, 9(5), 33-44. http://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n5p33
Aslanabadi, H., & Rasouli, G. (2013). The effect of games on improvement of Iranian EFL vocabulary knowledge in kindergartens. International Review of Social Sciences and Humanities, 6(1), 186-195.
Balchin, K., & Wild, C. (2020). Exploring the role of context and collaboration in normalizing technology use in English language teaching in secondary schools in Malaysia. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(7), 1437-1457. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1803360
Barseghian, T. (2011). Three trends that define the future of teaching and learning. KQED, 7(4), 12-14. https://www.kqed.org/
mindshift/7854/three-trends-that-define-the-future-of-teaching-and-learning
Barson, J., & Debski, R. (1996). Calling back call: Technology in the service of foreign language learning based on creativity, contingency, and goal-oriented activity. In M. Warschauer, (Ed.), Telecollaboration in foreign language learning. University of Hawai’i Press.
Beatty, K. (2003). Teaching and researching computer-assisted language learning. Pearson Education.
Bergil, A. S. (2016). The influence of willingness to communicate on overall speaking skills among EFL learners. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 232(2), 177-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.043
Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. International society for technology in education, 29(3), 1-16. https://www.rcboe.org/cms/lib/
ga01903614/centricity/domain/15451/flip_your_classroom.pdf
Blume, C. (2020). Games people (don’t) play: An analysis of pre-service EFL teachers’ behaviors and beliefs regarding digital game-based language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(1-2), 109-132. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1552599
Byrne, D. (1995). Games in teaching oral English. Longman Group United Kingdom Limited.
Chen, T. H. (2015). EFL undergraduates’ perceptions of blended speaking instruction. English Teaching & Learning, 39(2), 87-120.
Clifford, V. A. (1999). The development of autonomous learners in a university setting. Higher Education Research & Development, 18(1), 115-128. https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436990180109
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods
in education (8th ed.). Routledge.
Dolati, R., & Mikaili, P. (2011). Effects of instructional games on facilitating of student’s vocabulary learning. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5(11), 1218-1224. http://www.ajbasweb.com/old/ ajbas/2011/November-2011/1218-1224.pdf
Donaldson, R. P., & Haggstrom, M. A. (2006). Changing language education through CALL. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203008423
Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, N. J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://www.cc.kyoto-su.ac.jp/information/tesl-ej/ej37/r7.pdf
Echavez-Solano, N. (2003). A comparison of student outcomes and attitudes in technology-enhanced vs. traditional second-semester Spanish language courses (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, USA).
Engwall, O., & Lopes, J. (2020). Interaction and collaboration in robot-assisted language learning for adults. Computer Assisted Language Learning (pp. 1-37). https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1080/09588221.2020.1799821
Fahim, A., & Dhamotharan, M. (2016). Willingness to communicate in English among Trainee teachers in a Malaysian private University. Journal of Social Sciences, 12(2), 105-112. https://doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2016.105.112
Grant, S. (2020). Effects of intensive EFL immersion programs on willingness to communicate. The Language Learning Journal, 48(4), 442-453. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2017.1422274
Green, S. (2000). New perspectives on teaching and learning modern languages. Multilingual Matters Ltd. https://b2n.ir/g31450
Hadfield, J. (1990). A collection of games and activities for low to mid-intermediate students of English. Intermediate Communication Games. Thomus and Nelson and Nelson and Sons Ltd.
Healey, D. (1999). Classroom practice: Communicative skill-building tasks in CALL environments. In J. Egbert & E. Hanson-Smith (Eds.), CALL environments: Research, practice, and critical issues (pp. 116-136). Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
Inan, F. A., & Lowther, D. L. (2007). A comparison analysis of computer-supported learning models and guidelines. In F. M. M. Neto & F. U. Brasilerio (Eds.), Advances in computer- supported learning. Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.
Jafarigohar, M., Khoshsima, H., Haghighi, H., & Vahdany, F. (2019). Incorporation of flipped learning into EFL classrooms performance and perception. Iranian Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 8(3), 1-14. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.24763187.2019.8.3.1.5
Kang, S. J. (2005). Dynamic emergence of situational willingness to communicate in a second language. System, 33(2), 277-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.10.004
Kitao, K. (1995). Individualizing English instruction using computers. In K. Kitao & S. K. Kitao (Eds.), English teaching: Theory, research and practice (pp. 545-567). Eichosha.
Lambropoulos, N., Christopoulou, M., & Vlachos, K. (2006). Culture-based language learning objects: A CALL approach for a ubiquitous world. In P. Zaphiris & G. Zacharia (Eds.), User-centered computer aided language learning. Information Science Publishing.
Lee, G., & Wallace, A. (2018). Flipped learning in the English as a foreign language classroom: Outcomes and perceptions. TESOL Quarterly, 52(1), 62-84. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.372
Lin, W. S., & Wang, C. H. (2012). Antecedences to continued intentions of adopting e-learning system in blended learning instruction: A contingency framework based on models of information system success and task-technology fit. Computers & Education, 58(1), 88-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.008
Liu, Z. (2005). Reading behavior in the digital environment: Changes in reading behavior over the past ten years. Journal of Documentation, 61(6), 700-712. https://litmedmod.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/
liu_2005_lecture_numerique_competences_comportements.pdf
MacIntyre, P. D. (2007). Willingness to communicate in the second language: Understanding the decision to speak as a volitional
process. The Modern Language Journal, 91(4), 564-576. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4626086
MacIntyre, P. D., Baker, S. C., Clement, R., & Conrod, S. (2001). Willingness to communicate, social support, and language-learning orientations of immersion students. Studies on Second Language Acquisition, 23(3), 369-388. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263101003035
MacIntyre, P., & Charos, C. (1996). Personality, attitudes, and affect as predictors of second language communication. Journal of
Language and Social Psychology, 15(1), 3-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X960151001
MacIntyre, P., Clement, R., Dornyei, Z., & Noels, K. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal, 82(6), 545-562. https://doi.org/10.2307/330224
McCroskey, J. C. (1992). Reliability and validity of the willingness to communicate scale. Communication Quarterly, 40(1), 16-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379209369817
McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1987). Willingness to communicate. In J.C. McCroskey & J. S. Daly (Eds.), Personality and interpersonal communication (pp. 129-156). Retrieved from: https://b2n.ir/u04976
Mohammadi, E., & Mirdehghan, S. S. (2014). A CMC approach to teaching phrasal-verbs to Iranian EFL senior high school students: The case of blended learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98(6), 1174-1178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.531
Norton, P., & Wiburg, K. (2003). Teaching with technology. San Fransico, CA: Thomson Learning.
Pokhrel, S., & Chhetri, R. (2021). A literature review on impact of COVID-19 pandemic on teaching and learning. Higher Education for the Future, 8(1), 133-141. https://doi.org/10.1177/2347631120983481
Przybylski, A. K., Rigby, C. S., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). A motivational model of video game engagement. Review of General Psychology, 14(2), 154-166. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0019440
Rahbar, B., Suzani, M., & Sajadi, Z. (2016). The relationship between emotional intelligence and willingness to communicate among Iranian intermediate EFL learners. Journal of Language Teaching: Theory and Practice, 2(3), 10-17.
Richard-Amato, P. (1988). Making it happen: Interactions in the second language classroom. Longman, New York.
Richmond, V. P., Wrench, J. s., & McCroskey, J. C. (2013). Communication, avoidance, and effectiveness (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
Seljan, S., Banek, M., & Spirance, L. (2009). CALL (computer-assisted language learning) and distance learning. Journal of Language Teaching & Research 45, 711-740.
Smith, A., Legaki, Z., & Hamari, J. (2022). Games and gamification in flipped classrooms: A systematic review. 6th International GamiFIN Conference, Finland (pp. 33-43). https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3147/paper4.pdf
Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97-114). Oxford University Press. https://b2n.ir/a74290
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2002). Talking it through: Two French immersion learners’ response to reformulation. International Journal of Educational Research, 37(3-4), 285-304. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00006-5
Sweet, D. (2014). Microlectures in a flipped classroom: Application, creation, and resources. Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 26(1), 52-59. https://mwera.org/MWER/volumes/v26/issue1/v26n1-Street-BOOK-MEDIA-REVIEWS.pdf
Syed, H., & Kuzborska, I. (2020). Dynamics of factors underlying willingness to communicate in a second language. The Language Learning Journal, 48(4), 481-500. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2018.1435709
Valadi, A., Rezaee, A., & Baharvand, P. K. (2015). The relationship between language learners’ willingness to communicate and their oral language proficiency with regard to gender differences. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 4(5), 147-153. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.4n.5p.147
Van Laer, S., & Elen, J. (2017). In search of attributes that support self-regulation in blended learning environments. Education and Information Technologies, 22(4), 1395-1454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9505-x
Van Waes, L., Van Weijen, D., & Leijten, M. (2014). Learning to write in an online writing center: The effect of learning styles on the
writing process. Computers & Education, 73, 60-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.12.009
York, J., & deHaan, J. W. (2018). A constructivist approach to game-based language learning: Student perceptions in a beginner-level EFL context. International Journal of Game-Based Learning (IJGBL), 8(1), 19-40. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJGBL.2018010102
Yousefi, M., & Kasaian, S. A. (2014). Relationship between willingness to communicate and Iranian EFL learner’s speaking fluency and accuracy. Journal of Advances in English Language Teaching; 2(6), 61-72.