_1722246478 20240729131758000 Rovedar Daryoushbabazadeh@gmail.com Rovedar Journal of Contemporary Language Research J. Contemp. Lang. Res. 2980-8065 06 27 2024 3 2 Trut Thuy Pham https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6596-2686 Thanh Thao Le https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8471-8305 Introduction: Ungrading is an innovative assessment method that emphasizes individual learning journeys over conventional grading systems. As an emerging topic in educational reform, it promises to enhance intrinsic motivation and engagement among students. Therefore, the current study aimed to assess both the advantages and challenges of implementing ungrading in Vietnamese EFL contexts. By focusing on the experiences of EFL teachers at various career stages, the study aims to uncover insights into the operational and cultural barriers, as well as the potential benefits of this non-traditional assessment approach. Methodology: The methodology of this study was rooted in qualitative research, utilizing semi-structured interviews to gather data. A total of nine Vietnamese EFL teachers from two different educational institutions participated in the study. These teachers represented a range of career stages, providing a diverse perspective on the adoption of ungrading. Thematic analysis was employed to interpret the data collected from these interviews. Results: The thematic analysis highlighted a range of challenges associated with the implementation of ungrading. Early-career teachers reported difficulties in adapting teaching methods and providing tailored feedback within existing constraints. Mid-career teachers faced resistance from students accustomed to traditional grading systems. Teachers nearing the end of their careers struggled with integrating ungrading into an entrenched grade-centric educational framework. Despite these challenges, significant benefits of ungrading were identified, such as increased student motivation, improved interactions between students and teachers, and the promotion of critical thinking and lifelong learning skills. Conclusion: The findings from this study shed light on the complexities of adopting ungrading in Vietnamese EFL contexts and indicate a substantial need for support and strategic planning in implementing such educational innovations. The study underscores the transformative potential of ungrading in language learning environments and emphasizes the importance of considering both cultural and institutional factors when introducing educational reforms. This research contributes to the broader discourse on alternative assessment methods, advocating for a more nuanced approach to evaluation in education. 06 27 2024 64 72 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 10.58803/jclr.v3i2.103 https://jclr.rovedar.com/index.php/JCLR/article/view/103 https://jclr.rovedar.com/index.php/JCLR/article/download/103/127 https://jclr.rovedar.com/index.php/JCLR/article/download/103/127 Bao, N. V., & Cho, Y. (2022). How the high-stakes and college entrance exam affects students’ perception: Implication on management policy in higher education. East Asian Journal of Business Economics (EAJBE), 10(1), 83-94. https://doi.org/10.20498/eajbe.2022.10.1.83 10.1111/bjet.13105 10.4324/9781003362715-21 Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom. ASCD. 10.1207/S15328023TOP2804_04 10.5688/ajpe8850 10.1080/10668920903381789 Chen, X., Zou, D., Xie, H., & Cheng, G. (2021). Twenty years of personalized language learning. Educational Technology & Society, 24(1), 205-222. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26977868 10.1080/09645292.2022.2068138 10.3390/educsci13111091 Fosnot, C. T. (2013). Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice. Teachers College Press. 10.1002/pits.21901 10.20343/teachlearninqu.9.1.8 Guskey, T. R., & Bailey, J. M. (2001). Developing grading and reporting systems for student learning. Corwin Press. 10.1007/s11256-012-0216-3 Jackson, R. (1997). Religious education: An interpretive approach. Hodder. Johnson, R. E. (2022). Gradeless Assessment: Improving Engagement and Motivation in High School Classrooms (Doctoral dissertation, Thompson Rivers University). 10.1080/15512169.2022.2160336 10.1007/s11528-021-00682-w Kohn, A. (1999). The schools our children deserve: moving beyond traditional classrooms and “tougher standards”. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. Kohn, A., & Blum, S. D. (2020). Ungrading: Why rating students undermines learning (and what to do instead). West Virginia University Press. 10.1080/00131880500498396 10.59400/fls.v5i2.1863 10.25073/2525-2445/vnufs.4286 10.12691/education-6-5-10 Nunan, D. (1999). Second Language Teaching & Learning. Heinle & Heinle Publishers. O’donoghue, T. (2006). Planning your qualitative research project: An introduction to interpretivist research in education. Routledge. 10.4324/9781351165563 10.3138/jelis-2021-0062 10.1017/9781009024532 Steffe, L. P., & Gale, J. E. (Eds.). (1995). Constructivism in education. Psychology Press. 10.1080/17501229.2020.1846041 Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard university press. 10.1080/00461520.2012.722805 10.1080/10511970.2020.1733149