_1728272599 20241007071319000 Rovedar Daryoushbabazadeh@gmail.com Rovedar Journal of Contemporary Language Research J. Contemp. Lang. Res. 2980-8065 09 23 2024 3 3 MInh Trang Nguyen https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9893-8392 Introduction: The current research aimed to investigate rhetorical move structures in abstracts written for TESOL international conferences by non-native speakers of English. Methodology: Sixty abstracts were collected from Vietnamese and Thai proceedings published by three universities. These abstracts were written for the TESOL conventions in the period 2018-2019. The study used the five-move scheme (I-P-M-R-D) adapted from Pho’s (2008) framework for move analysis with the assistance of the automatic text analysis and move occurrences soft wares AntMover and AntConc. Results: Results from the study showed that Methodology, Result, and Purpose sections played vital parts in abstract writing while Introduction and Discussion seized small portions in the corpus. While writing abstracts for TESOL conventions, the Method section is frequently repeated or embedded in the 60 target abstracts of the present study. The present study also indicated that the authors writing papers for TESOL conferences did not strictly follow the five-move sequence as expected due to word limitation and face-to-face mode of paper presentations at conventions. Non-linear move patterns were also recognized that are aligned with the findings of previous research studies. Conclusion: The findings of this study revealed that the abstracts written for TESOL international conferences in this research have followed the P-M-R order of an abstract rhetorical structure. This study's findings on rhetorical structures could be of great assistance in helping novice writers in composing well-structured abstracts for TESOL conferences.  09 23 2024 73 84 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 10.58803/jclr.v3i3.113 https://jclr.rovedar.com/index.php/JCLR/article/view/113 https://jclr.rovedar.com/index.php/JCLR/article/download/113/141 https://jclr.rovedar.com/index.php/JCLR/article/download/113/141 10.32996/jeltal.2021.3.7.1 Alfolaranmi, A. (2024). Towards an ideal abstract in academic writing: Some crucial components. Jozac Academic Voice, 4(1), 20-23. DOI: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8057-137X 10.5539/elt.v6n2p1 Anthony, L. (2016). AntMover (Version 1.1.0). A freeware text structure (moves) analysis program. Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan. https://www.laurenceanthony.net/software Anthony, L. (2016). AntConc (Version 4.2.0). A freeware corpus analysis toolkit for concordancing and text analysis. Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan. https://www.laurenceanthony.net/software/antconc/ 10.1108/JDOC-09-2015-0111 Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. Longman. Bouchricha, I. (2024). Abstract research paper: Types, tips & best practices in 2024. https://research.com/research/abstract-research-paper Badri, T. (2019). Writing the title, abstract, and keywords for a medical article: to be concise and accurate. La Tunisie Médicale, 97(7), 865-869. PMID: 31872396 Brown, L. (2019). How long should an abstract be? Crowd Writer. https://www.crowdwriter.com/blog/how-long-should-an-abstract-be 10.1016/0306-4573(95)00024-B Can, S., Karabacak, E. & Qin, J. (2016). Structure of moves in research 10.3390/publications4030023 10.1108/00220410610700953 10.1515/text.1.1996.16.4.481 10.4324/9780203927984 10.1007/s00142-024-00688-5 Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: Social interaction in academic writing. Longman. Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. University of Michigan Press. 10.1016/j.esp.2004.02.002 Hyland, K. (2009). Teaching and researching writing. Routlege, Abingdon, UK. 10.1016/j.esp.2004.08.003 10.1016/j.esp.2003.06.001 10.1016/S0889-4906(01)00033-3 Martín-Martín, P. (2005). The rhetoric of the abstract in English and Spanish scientific discourse: A cross-cultural genre-analytic approach. Peter Lang publisher. 10.1371/journal.pone.0205417 10.17576/3L-2014-2003-13 10.17576/3L-2018-2404-06 Payant, C., & Hardy, J. A. (2016). The dynamic rhetorical structures of TESOL conference abstracts. BC TEAL Journal, 1(1), 1-171. https://doi.org/10.14288/bctj.v1i1.220 10.1177/1461445607087010 10.5539/elt.v4n1p162 language theses. English Language Teaching, 4(1), 162-166. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1080319 Regoniel, P. (2021). How to write a good abstract: Four essential elements with example. Simplyeducate. https://simplyeducate.me/2021/11/09/a-good-abstract/ Russo, A. (2020). Abstracts. pp. 1-7. San Jose State University Writing Center. https://www.sjsu.edu/writingcenter/docs/handouts/Abstracts.pdf 10.5539/elt.v7n8p81 10.1515/text.1.1990.10.4.365 10.1515/text-2014-0023 10.1016/j.esp.2012.09.001 Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis. Cambridge University Press. 10.22452/jml.vol31no1.3 10.5430/wjel.v12n6p492