<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<doi_batch xmlns="http://www.crossref.org/schema/4.3.6" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:jats="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/JATS1" xmlns:ai="http://www.crossref.org/AccessIndicators.xsd" xmlns:fr="http://www.crossref.org/fundref.xsd" version="4.3.6" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.crossref.org/schema/4.3.6 https://www.crossref.org/schemas/crossref4.3.6.xsd">
  <head>
    <doi_batch_id>_1766034142</doi_batch_id>
    <timestamp>20251218083222000</timestamp>
    <depositor>
      <depositor_name>Rovedar</depositor_name>
      <email_address>Daryoushbabazadeh@gmail.com</email_address>
    </depositor>
    <registrant>Rovedar</registrant>
  </head>
  <body>
    <journal>
      <journal_metadata>
        <full_title>Journal of Contemporary Language Research</full_title>
        <abbrev_title>J. Contemp. Lang. Res.</abbrev_title>
        <issn media_type="electronic">2980-8065</issn>
      </journal_metadata>
      <journal_issue>
        <publication_date media_type="online">
          <month>09</month>
          <day>30</day>
          <year>2025</year>
        </publication_date>
        <journal_volume>
          <volume>4</volume>
        </journal_volume>
        <issue>3</issue>
      </journal_issue>
      <journal_article xmlns:jats="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/JATS1" xmlns:ai="http://www.crossref.org/AccessIndicators.xsd" publication_type="full_text" metadata_distribution_opts="any">
        <titles>
          <title>Exploring Blending in the Morphological Construction of Native Brand Names in Eastern Nigeria</title>
        </titles>
        <contributors>
          <person_name contributor_role="author" sequence="first">
            <surname>Echezonachi G. Nwonu</surname>
          </person_name>
          <person_name contributor_role="author" sequence="additional">
            <surname>Chikelu Ihunanya Ezenwafor-Afuecheta</surname>
          </person_name>
        </contributors>
        <jats:abstract xmlns:jats="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/JATS1">
          <jats:p>Introduction: This study investigates blending as a creative morphological strategy in brand name formation and examines the factors that motivate its use.Methodology: Drawing on Dressler’s (1987) Natural Morphology Theory, it highlights both the natural and innovative dimensions of blending in brand naming. Following Mathew’s 1974 model and Mattiello’s (2013) model, the analysis applies two main classification systems: word class and morphological structure. The word class classification includes brand names formed from Igbo nouns and verbs, combinations of loanwords and Igbo terms, English nouns and verbs, pseudo-morphemes, adjectives, and translated forms. The morphological classification distinguishes among morphotactical blends (total and partial), morphophonological blends (overlapping and non-overlapping), and morphosemantic blends (attributive and coordinate). Data were collected from the Onitsha Relief Market, Anambra State, Nigeria.Results: The analysis reveals that morphophonological blends are the most iconic among the identified types. Blending in the data demonstrates both creative and adaptive linguistic tendencies, reflecting natural morphological processes. The findings indicate that blending in brand naming functions primarily as a creative linguistic process rather than a productive one.Conclusion: In conclusion, the use of blending is motivated by phonological/graphological, morphological, and semantic considerations,showcasing the dynamic interplay between linguistic innovation and communicative intent in brand creation.</jats:p>
        </jats:abstract>
        <publication_date media_type="online">
          <month>09</month>
          <day>30</day>
          <year>2025</year>
        </publication_date>
        <pages>
          <first_page>33</first_page>
          <last_page>46</last_page>
        </pages>
        <fr:program name="fundref"/>
        <ai:program xmlns:ai="http://www.crossref.org/AccessIndicators.xsd" name="AccessIndicators">
          <ai:license_ref>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</ai:license_ref>
        </ai:program>
        <doi_data>
          <doi>10.58803/jclr.v4i3.139</doi>
          <resource>https://jclr.rovedar.com/index.php/JCLR/article/view/139</resource>
          <collection property="crawler-based">
            <item crawler="iParadigms">
              <resource>https://jclr.rovedar.com/index.php/JCLR/article/download/139/153</resource>
            </item>
          </collection>
          <collection property="text-mining">
            <item>
              <resource mime_type="application/pdf">https://jclr.rovedar.com/index.php/JCLR/article/download/139/153</resource>
            </item>
          </collection>
        </doi_data>
        <citation_list>
          <citation key="6099">
            <unstructured_citation>Aronoff, M. (1976). Word formation in generative grammar. Cambridge: MIT Press.</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="6100">
            <doi>10.1002/9781405166348.ch11</doi>
          </citation>
          <citation key="6101">
            <doi>10.1515/9783110289572.11</doi>
          </citation>
          <citation key="6102">
            <unstructured_citation>Bailey, C. (2007). Piapoco and natural morphology theory. In R. Shields (Ed.), Proceedings of WIGL 2007 (pp. 33-53). United States: University of Wisconsin–Madison. https://langsci.wisc.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/1012/2019/05/bailey.pdf</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="6103">
            <unstructured_citation>Cutler, A. (1980). Productivity in word formation. Linguistic Inquiry, 11(3), 469-505. https://repository.ubn.ru.nl/bitstream/handle/2066/15646/6051.pdf</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="6104">
            <unstructured_citation>Danks, D. C. (2003). Separating blends: A formal investigation of the blending process in English and its relationship to associated word formation processes (Unpublished master’s thesis). England: University of Liverpool. https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/3174916/1/402356.pdf</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="6105">
            <doi>10.1075/slcs.10.30dre</doi>
          </citation>
          <citation key="6106">
            <unstructured_citation>Fleischer, W. (1975). Wortbildung der deutschen Gegenwartssprache [Word formation of contemporary German]. Leipzig: VEB Bibliographisches Institut.</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="6107">
            <unstructured_citation>Fradin, B. (2000). Combining forms, blends and related phenomena. In U. Doleschal, &amp; A. Thornton (Eds.), Extragrammatical and marginal morphology (pp.11-59). München: Lincom Europa, Lincom Europa. https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01955714v1</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="6108">
            <unstructured_citation>Gries, S. (2004). Isn’t that fantabulous? How similarity motivates intentional morphological blends in English. In M. Achard &amp; Kemmersuzanne (Eds.), Language, culture, and mind. Stanford, CA: CSLI.</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="6109">
            <doi>10.1515/9783110856132</doi>
          </citation>
          <citation key="6110">
            <doi>10.1075/cilt.243.08kem</doi>
          </citation>
          <citation key="6111">
            <unstructured_citation>Matthews, P. H. (1974). Morphology: An introduction to the theory of word structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="6112">
            <doi>10.1515/9783110295399</doi>
          </citation>
          <citation key="6113">
            <unstructured_citation>Mayerthaler, W. (1981). Morphologische natürlichkeit [Morphological naturalness] (Linguistische Arbeiten, 105). Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="6114">
            <unstructured_citation>Panić, O. (2004). Brand names: How they are made and what they are made for. British and American Studies Journal, 10, 285-291.</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="6115">
            <unstructured_citation>Plag, I. (1999). Morphological productivity: Structural constraints in English derivation. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="6116">
            <doi>10.1017/CBO9780511841323</doi>
          </citation>
          <citation key="6117">
            <unstructured_citation>Room, A. (1994). NTC’s dictionary of trade name origins. Lincolnwood: NITC Business Books.</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
        </citation_list>
      </journal_article>
    </journal>
  </body>
</doi_batch>
