_1689228948 20230713061548000 Rovedar Daryoushbabazadeh@gmail.com Rovedar Journal of Contemporary Language Research J. Contemp. Lang. Res. 2980-8065 06 25 2023 2 2 Zahra Fakour Rashid Behzad Ghonsooly Afsaneh Ghanizadeh Introduction: Due to the current situation (coronavirus pandemic) as well as time and place ‎restrictions, the replacement of traditional classes with online courses is prevailing, and ‎instructors and learners rarely attend in a classroom. Thus, an unexpected immersion in virtual ‎learning revealed the advantages and disadvantages of virtual education. The present study ‎aimed to explore the merits and the demerits of the virtual master’s program of the English department ‎of universities regarding students' perspectives on motivation and self-efficacy. Methodology: The researchers developed and validated an instrument ‎that measured online students' self-efficacy and motivation toward the virtual programs. Relying on the semi-structured interviews and open-ended ‎questions, the researchers developed a 21-item scale on a 5-point Likert scale. The designed scale distributed among 151 students from four universities in ‎Mashhad, Iran. Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis as well as correlational analysis were performed to answer the research questions. The SEM model was used to explore the interrelationships among attitudes toward virtual ‎programs, self-efficacy, and motivation Results: The obtained results indicate an acceptable level of reliability for the scale (0.82). The findings indicated that the independent variable of the virtual program of the ‎university positively had a direct relationship with the dependent variables of the study, which were motivation ‎and self-efficacy. Conclusion: Based on the findings, it can be concluded that virtual education still needs new expertise and more developed skills from educational designers and programmers to students and instructors. 06 25 2023 99 108 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 10.58803/jclr.v2i2.25 https://jclr.rovedar.com/index.php/JCLR/article/view/25 https://jclr.rovedar.com/index.php/JCLR/article/download/25/79 https://jclr.rovedar.com/index.php/JCLR/article/download/25/79 10.1037/0022-0663.76.3.478 10.1080/0958822042000334253 Arkorful, V., & Abaidoo, N. (2015). The role of e-learning, advantages and disadvantages of its adoption in higher education. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 12(1), 29-42. Available at: https://www.ijern.com/journal/2014/December-2014/34.pdf 10.4278/0890-1171-12.1.8 10.1037/0022-0663.89.4.696 Bates, R., & Khasawneh, S. (2007). Self-efficacy and college students’ perceptions and use of 10.1016/j.chb.2004.04.004 Brouse, C. H., Basch, C. E., LeBlanc, M., McKnight, K. R., & Lei, T. (2010). College students' academic motivation: Differences by gender, class, and source of payment. College Quarterly, 13(1), 1-10. Available at: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ912093.pdf 10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.04.001 10.1080/09588220902920094 10.1016/j.chb.2010.01.011 Chun, D. M., & Plass, J. L. (1997). Research on text comprehension in multimedia environments. Language Learning & Technology, 1(1), 60-81. 10.5539/jel.v8n6p15 Creswell, J. W. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative. Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ Dörnyei, Z. (2001). New themes and approaches in second language motivation research. 10.1017/S0267190501000034 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.11.026 10.1108/EUM0000000005484 10.36965/OJAKM.2017.5(1)101-111 Ghonsooly, B., Elahi, M., & Golparvar, S. E. (2012). General English university students’ self-efficacy and their achievement. Iranian EFL Journal, 8(3), 153-173. Available at: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=60ae1edc09c4bfdf9e34a268fe16ab04a8b24f1c#page=153 Harasim, L. M. (1989). Online education: An environment for collaboration and intellectual amplification. In L. M. Harasim (Ed.), Online education: Perspectives on a new environment (pp. 39-66). Praeger Publishers. New York. 10.1016/S0079-7421(10)52007-3 Hrastinski, S. (2008). Asynchronous and synchronous e-learning. Educause Quarterly, 31(4), 51-55. Available at: https://er.educause.edu/-/media/files/article-downloads/eqm0848.pdf Hills, H. (2003). Individual preferences in e-learning. Gower Publishing, Ltd. 10.4135/9781848608351.n30 10.1023/A:1002919531780 Lomicka, L. (1998). To gloss or not to gloss: An investigation of reading comprehension online. Language Learning & Technology, 1(2), 41-50. Available at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/ling_facpub/2/ Lucey, K. (2018). The effect of motivation on student persistence in online higher education: A phenomenological study of how adult learners experience motivation in a webbased distance learning environment Duquesne University. 10.1207/s15326985ep3201_1 McNabb, M. L., Hassel, B., & Steiner, L. (2002). Literacy learning on the net: An exploratory study. Available at: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED450344.pdf 10.1080/08923648909526659 10.1006/ceps.1994.1015 Osterlind, S. (2002). Constructing test items: Vol. 47. Evaluation in education and human services. Springer.Dordrecht, the Netherlands. Rosegard, E., & Wilson, J. (2013). Capturing students' attention: An empirical study. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 13(5), 1-20. Available at: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1017063.pdf 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00108.x 10.5840/cultura20107133 Su, Y., & Klein, J. (2006). Effects of navigation tools and computer confidence on performance and attitudes in a hypermedia learning environment. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 15(1), 87-106. Available at: https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/6118/ Taipjutorus, W., Hansen, S., & Brown, M. (2012). Improving learners’ self-efficacy in a learner-controlled online learning environment: A correlational study. Future Challenges, sustainable futures. Proceedings ASCILITE Wellington. (pp. 907-911). Yang, S. J. (2006). Context aware ubiquitous learning environments for peer-to-peer collaborative learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 9(1), 188-201. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.9.1.188