_1687065251 20230618051411000 Rovedar Daryoushbabazadeh@gmail.com Rovedar Journal of Contemporary Language Research J. Contemp. Lang. Res. 2980-8065 12 25 2022 1 2 Naniana N. Benu https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7450-8059 Piter Baun https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8416-3901 Norci Beeh https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9956-695X Seprianus A. Nenotek https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0657-5297 Introduction: Cohesive devices are regarded as an important linking marker in organizing the sequence of the idea. The purpose of this study was to find out the cohesive English devices used by Indonesian EFL students in their writing. It also dealt with the factors affecting students’ writing ability with regard to English cohesive mastery. Methodology: Participants in the current study were 100 sixth-semester EFL students studying at universities in Kupang, Indonesia. The instruments used were fill-in-the-blank tests and a sequence of pictures. The analysis of collected data revealed that the respondents were able to use references and conjunction in the fill-the-blank writing tasks. Results: It was found that substitution and ellipsis were considered difficult cohesive devices for students. The findings also confirmed that the respondents had problems using an ellipsis based on a sequence of pictures in their writing. The obtained results indicated that the Indonesian students favored using reference and conjunction cohesive devices. Various factors, such as a lack of teachers’ knowledge in introducing cohesive devices to students, can affect Indonesian learners' use of cohesive devices. Conclusion: The results of this research provided a general understanding of cohesive devices in Indonesian EFL learners’ writing. This will help to identify students’ problems in using cohesive devices, such as overuse, underuse, or never use of certain cohesive devices. Teachers are suggested to introduce the devices, such as substitution and ellipsis, in writing class. 12 25 2022 65 70 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 10.58803/jclr.v1i2.9 https://jclr.rovedar.com/index.php/JCLR/article/view/9 https://jclr.rovedar.com/index.php/JCLR/article/download/9/13 https://jclr.rovedar.com/index.php/JCLR/article/download/9/13 Albana, H. H., Marzuki, A. G., Alek., & Hidayat, D. N. (2020). Cohesive devices in student’s writing (A discourse analysis on argumentative text). Jurnal Pendidikan Humaniora, 8 (1), 6-11. Available at: http://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jph/article/view/13632/6156 Alisha, F., Safitri, N., & Santoso, I. (2019). Students’ difficulties in writing EFL. Project. 2(1), 20-25. Available at: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwiZ36i4hJT8AhWD87sIHT7RBSEQFnoECA4QAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fjournal.ikipsiliwangi.ac.id%2Findex.php%2Fproject%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F1659%2Fpdf&usg=AOvVaw0xa2IQsYESfXOjhjFy2MHb 10.35961/salee.v1i01.73 10.2991/ictte-17.2017.4 Blaxell, G., & Spence, B. (2001). English plus 4. Horwitz Martin Education. 10.26618/exposure.v7i2.1502 10.12928/eltej.v4i1.2371 10.1017/CBO9781139524599 10.28918/erudita.v2i1.5441 Greenbaum, S., & Nelson, G. (2002). An introduction to English grammar, 2nd edition. Pearson Education. Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1989). Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective.Oxford University Press. 10.17576/3L-2021-2702-02 10.15294/eej.v12i1.49052 at PST. English Education Journal, 12(1), 96-103. DOI: https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eej/article/view/49052/21169 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.276 10.24127/pj.v9i1.2588 10.29408/veles.v6i1.4969 10.5539/elt.v5n5p56 10.4236/ce.2019.1013260 10.30983/educative.v4i2.2544 Nenotek, S. A., Tlonaen, Z. A., & Manubulu, H. A. (2022). Exploring university students’ difficulties in writing English academic 10.35445/alishlah.v14i1.1352 10.47175/rielsj.v3i2.452 10.24127/pj.v6i2.1003 10.23971/jefl.v10i2.1949 Patel, M. F., & Jain, P. M. (2008). English Language Teaching. Sunrise publisher & distributors. Peterson, P. W. (1980). Changing times, changing tenses: A review of the english tense system. U.S. Information Agency. 10.24127/pj.v11i2.4744 Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. (2010). Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics (4th edition). Longman Pearson. Rudiana. (2021). The realization of grammatical cohesion devices in EFL students’ argumentative essays. JALL: Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literacy, 5(1), https://jurnal.unigal.ac.id/index.php/jall/index Salkie, R. (1995). Text and discourse analysis. Routledge. Seken, K., & Suarnajaya, W. (2013). An analysis of the cohesion and coherence of students English writings at the second grade of Sman 1 Labuapi West Lombok. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Indonesia, 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jpbi.v1i0.735 Stephens, M. (1998). Pictures for Writing: Book 1. London: Longman Group Limited. Sudarwati, Th. M., & Grace, E. (2006). Look ahead: English course 3 for senior high school. Airlangga.