Rhetorical Move Structure in Corporate Annual Reports: Comparing Saudi and American Move Structures

Main Article Content

Anfal Alowaishez

Abstract

Introduction: This study applied genre analysis to Saudi and American corporate annual report introductions to examine rhetorical moves, communicative purposes, and discourse structures across banking, energy, and digital sectors. Therefore, the current paper aimed to establish a model for rhetorical moves structure for the corporate introduction, bridging academic research and professional practice and addressing gaps in genre studies.


Methodology: A mixed-method approach was employed, consisting of a more than 200,000-word corpus analysis and six expert interviews to address the research objectives.


Results: The findings indicated a four-move rhetorical structure in annual report introductions, including setting the scene, market positioning, expressing gratitude, and looking forward, across three industries in Saudi Arabia and the U.S. and outlined cultural differences between discourse communities.


Conclusion: This study analyzed corporate annual report introductions across three industries in two countries over five years, identifying a flexible four-move structure shaped by industry and cultural factors, providing insights for corporate writers and discourse researchers.

Article Details

How to Cite
Alowaishez, A. (2025). Rhetorical Move Structure in Corporate Annual Reports: Comparing Saudi and American Move Structures. Journal of Contemporary Language Research, 4(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.58803/jclr.v4i1.129
Section
Research Articles

References

Amnuai, W. (2019). Analyses of rhetorical moves and linguistic realisations in accounting research article abstracts published in international and Thai-based journals. Sage Open, 9(1), 2158244018822384. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018822384

Askehave, I., & Nielsen, A. E. (2005). What are the characteristics of digital genres? Genre theory from a multi-modal perspective. Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 89a–98a. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2005.687

Bargiela-Chiappini, F. (2009). The handbook of business discourse. Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748631834

Bhatia, V. K. (2013). Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12176867

Bhatia, V. K. (2017). Critical genre analysis: Investigating interdiscursive performance in professional practice. Routledge.

Bostan, I., Chersan, I. C., Danileț, M., Ifrim, M., & Chirilă, V. (2020). Investigations regarding the linguistic register used by managers to convey to stakeholders a positive view of their company, in the context of the business sustainability desideratum. Sustainability, 12(17), 6867.

Bu, H., Connor-Linton, J., & Wang, L. (2020). Linguistic variation in the discourse of corporate annual reports: A multi-dimensional analysis. Discourse Studies, 22(6), 647–677. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445620928231

Conaway, R. N., & Wardrope, W. J. (2010). Do their words really matter? Thematic analysis of US and Latin American CEO letters. The Journal of Business Communication (1973), 47(2), 141–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943610364523

Cortes, V. (2013). The purpose of this study is to: Connecting lexical bundles and moves in research article introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12(1), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2012.11.002

Craig, R. J., & Brennan, N. M. (2012). An exploration of the relationship between language choice in CEO letters to shareholders and corporate reputation. Accounting Forum, 36(3), 166–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2012.02.004

Dos Santos, V. P. (2002). Genre analysis of business letters of negotiation. English for Specific Purposes, 21(2), 167–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00028-4

Dudley-Evans, T. (2002). Genre analysis: An approach to text analysis for ESP. In Coulthard, M. (ed.), Advances in written text analysis (pp. 233–242). Routledge.

Garzone, G. E. (2018). Discourse, communication and the enterprise: Where business meets discourse. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Haugaard, R. H., & Laursen, A. L. (2021). Investigating the move structure of management forewords: A comparative study of forewords from Spanish and Danish annual reports. Globe: A Journal of Language, Culture and Communication, 13, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.5278/ojs.globe.v13i.6565

Hodges, B. D., Kuper, A., & Reeves, S. (2008). Discourse analysis. BMJ, 337. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a879

Hussain, S., Mohamad Ali, A., Kasim, Z., & Jalaluddin, I. (2020). A review on the rhetorical structure and linguistic features of corporate annual reports. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 10. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v10-i9/7591

Hyland, K. (1998). Exploring corporate rhetoric: Metadiscourse in the CEO’s letter. Journal of Business Communication, 35(2), 224–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/002194369803500203

Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. University of Michigan Press.

Hyland, K. (2012). Corpora and academic discourse. In K. Hyland, C.M. Huat & M. Handford (Eds.). Corpus applications in applied linguistics (pp. 30-46). Continuum. http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781472541611.ch-003

Koester, A. (2006). Investigating workplace discourse. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203015742

Lahuerta Pujol, C., Moreno Cano, A., & Miguel, J. C. (2022). Multimodal analysis of advertising discourse during the lockdown due to COVID-19: Comparison of the communication strategies of financial services and automotive products in Spain. Communication & Society, 35(1), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.35.1.215-232

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355

Mautner, G., & Rainer, F. (2017). Handbook of business communication: Linguistic approaches. Walter de Gruyter Inc. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614514862

Roberts, C., & Sarangi, S. (2005). Theme‐oriented discourse analysis of medical encounters. Medical Education, 39(6), 632–640. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02171.x

Rutherford, B. A. (2005). Genre analysis of corporate annual report narratives: A corpus linguistics-based approach. Journal of Business Communication, 42(4), 349–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943605279244

Skulstad, A. S. (1996). Rhetorical organization of chairmen’s statements. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(1), 43–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.1996.tb00088.x

Smailović, J., Žnidaršič, M., Valentinčič, A., Lončarski, I., Pahor, M., Martins, P. T., & Pollak, S. (2017). Automatic analysis of annual financial reports: A case study. Computación y Sistemas, 21(4), 809–818. https://doi.org/10.13053/cys-21-4-2863

Smith, M., & Taffler, R. J. (2000). The chairman’s statement—A content analysis of discretionary narrative disclosures. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 13(5), 624–647. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570010353738

Statista. (2024). Number of FDIC-insured commercial banks in the United States from 2000 to 2023. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/184536/number-of-fdic-insured-us-commercial-bank-institutions/

Stukker, N., Bateman, J. A., McNamara, D., & Spooren, W. (Eds.). (2024). Multidisciplinary views on discourse genre: A research agenda (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003335603

Swales, J. M. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524827

Wenger, E. (2011). Communities of practice: A brief introduction. Retrieved January 10, 2024, from

https://www.ohr.wisc.edu/cop/articles/communities_practice_intro_wenger.pdf

Widdowson, H. G. (2007). Discourse analysis. Oxford University Press.

Zhuang, Q. Y., Li, X. T., & Li, X. Q. (2024). A corpus-assisted comparative study of Chinese and Western CEO statements in annual reports: Discourse-historical approach. Corpus-Based Studies Across Humanities, 1(1), 217–243. https://doi.org/10.1515/csh-2023-0017