English Language Teaching at the Tertiary Level in Bangladesh: Trends, Challenges, and Institutional Responses
Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction: The current context of English language teaching (ELT) in tertiary education in Bangladesh is a confluence of several issues such as globalization, employability pressure, multilingual nationhood and a polarized public–private higher education system. There is a growing emphasis on communicative competence, outcome-based education (OBE), English-medium instruction (EMI), and learner-centred pedagogy in the national policy and institutional strategy, but a disconnect remains between policy and practice. This study explores the trends, challenges, and institutional responses that have been shaping tertiary ELT in Bangladesh.
Methodology: This is a documentary secondary data integrative review, which is exploratory in nature and is synthesized narratively. After searching 5 databases and targeting specific institutional sources, 126 documents were kept, which comprised 62 peer-reviewed articles, 45 curriculum documents, 7 national policy documents, and 12 quality-assurance reports published between January 2010 and December 2025. A multi-level institutional analysis framework, combining Scott's three pillars of regulative, normative, and cultural-cognitive, and critical applied linguistics, was used in the analysis of the data.
Results: Three trends were found that converged: formal implementation of OBE frameworks, growth of ESP and EAP provision, and digital integration in the post-pandemic era. High tertiary student–teacher ratios, examination-driven pedagogy, uneven enactment of EMI, high levels of code-switching in the classroom, and a high level of variation in entry proficiency are all obstacles to these advances. Institutional responses, such as foundation programmes, language centres, faculty development and employer engagement, are now commonplace but are not often assessed for longer-term impact.
Conclusion: The issue is not that the sector lacks a reform effort, but that the regulatory, normative and cultural-cognitive aspects of the sector are structurally misaligned, and that this inevitably leads to a form of performative compliance with ambitious mandates. To achieve sustainable improvement, policy adaptation needs to be contextually grounded, evaluation needs to be done longitudinally, teachers need ongoing development, and there needs to be more articulation between English provision and graduate employability. The study provides an integrated analytical framework for tertiary ELT reform, and a sequenced, provenance-labelled reform agenda.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Al Mamun, M. A. (2021). English language anxiety of tertiary level learners in Bangladesh: Level and sources. English Language Teaching, 14(11), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v14n11p49
Alam, M. (2025). Shaping written corrective feedback perspectives and practices: Comparing novice and experienced instructors of English for academic purposes in Bangladesh. Language Testing in Asia, 15, Article 58. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-025-00390-9
Alderson, J. C., & Wall, D. (1993). Does washback exist? Applied Linguistics, 14(2), 115–129. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/14.2.115
Ali, M. M., & Hamid, M. O. (2020). Teaching English to the test: Why does negative washback exist within secondary education in Bangladesh? Language Assessment Quarterly, 17(2), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2020.1717495
Ali, M. M., & Hamid, M. O. (2023). Teacher agency and washback: Insights from classrooms in rural Bangladesh. ELT Journal, 77(1), 52–61. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccac032
Ali, M. M., Hamid, M. O., & Hardy, I. (2020). Ritualisation of testing: Problematising high-stakes English-language testing in Bangladesh. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 50(4), 533–553. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2018.1535890
Baethge, C., Goldbeck-Wood, S., & Mertens, S. (2019). SANRA—A scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 4, Article 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-019-0064-8
Baker, W., Morán Panero, S., Álvarez Valencia, J. A., Alhasnawi, S., Boonsuk, Y., Ngo, P. L. H., Martínez-Sánchez, M. M., Miranda, N., & Ronzón-Montiel, G. J. (2025). Decolonizing English in higher education: Global Englishes and TESOL as opportunities or barriers. TESOL Quarterly, 59(1), 281–309. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3317
Bashir, A., & Ferdousy, S. (2006). Problems and strategies of teaching English in large classes at universities in Bangladesh. Stamford Journal of English, 2, 38–52.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
Chandha, F. Y., & Chowdury, M. A. U. (2023). Teachers’ perception of using technology in a blended learning environment to facilitate collaborative learning in Bangladesh. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference of the Asia Association of Computer-Assisted Language Learning (AsiaCALL 2022) (Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, Vol. 744, pp. 21–33). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-042-8_4
Chowdhury, N., & Shaila, S. M. (2013). Teaching speaking in large classes: Crossing the barriers. Stamford Journal of English, 6, 72–89. https://doi.org/10.3329/sje.v6i0.13904
Chowdhury, R., & Kabir, A. H. (2014). Language wars: English education policy and practice in Bangladesh. Multilingual Education, 4, Article 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13616-014-0021-2
Committee on Publication Ethics. (2023). Authorship and AI tools: COPE position statement. https://publicationethics.org/guidance/cope-position/authorship-and-ai-tools
Council of Europe. (2020). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment — Companion volume. Council of Europe Publishing.
Dawadi, S. (2021). Factors influencing washback of a high-stakes English-as-a-foreign-language test. TESL-EJ, 25(3), Article a1. https://tesl-ej.org/pdf/ej99/a1.pdf
Educational Testing Service. (2025). TOEFL iBT test scores and the Common European Framework of Reference. https://www.ets.org/toefl
EF Education First. (2024). EF English Proficiency Index 2024: Bangladesh fact sheet. https://www.ef.com/assetscdn/WIBIwq6RdJvcD9bc8RMd/cefcom-epi-site/fact-sheets/2024/ef-epi-fact-sheet-bangladesh-english.pdf
Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
Hamid, M. O. (2016). The linguistic market for English in Bangladesh. Current Issues in Language Planning, 17(1), 36–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2016.1105909
Hamid, M. O., & Jahan, I. (2015). Language, identity, and social divides: Medium of instruction debates in Bangladeshi print media. Comparative Education Review, 59(1), 75–101. https://doi.org/10.1086/679192
Hamid, M. O., & Rahman, A. (2019). Language in education policy in Bangladesh: A neoliberal turn? In A. Kirkpatrick & A. Liddicoat (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of language education policy in Asia (pp. 382–398). Routledge.
Hamid, M. O., & Sultana, S. (2024). English-medium instruction in higher education in Bangladesh. In K. Bolton, W. Botha, & B. Lin (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of English-medium instruction in higher education (pp. 352–364). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003011644-30
Haque, M. N. (2022). English language teaching practices at the tertiary level of Bangladesh: A public university alumni’s feedback. EnJourMe (English Journal of Merdeka): Culture, Language, and Teaching of English, 7(1), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.26905/enjourme.v7i1.8074
Hasan, M. K., Yadav, R., Razaque, M. A., Talukder, M. S., & Nahar, N. (2024). Measuring the mediating role of quality education for ensuring employability skills: An analysis of higher education student perception in Bangladesh. PLOS ONE, 19(10), Article e0310815. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0310815
Islam, M. S., & Stapa, M. B. (2021). Students’ low proficiency in spoken English in private universities in Bangladesh: Reasons and remedies. Language Testing in Asia, 11(1), Article 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-021-00139-0
Islam, M. S., Hasan, M. K., Sultana, S., Karim, A., & Rahman, M. M. (2021). English language assessment in Bangladesh today: Principles, practices, and problems. Language Testing in Asia, 11(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-020-00116-z
Jasim, M. M. (2021, March 12). Universities to adopt outcome-based education system. The Business Standard. https://www.tbsnews.net/bangladesh/education/universities-adopt-outcome-based-education-system-215209
Kamlun, K., Jawing, E., & Abdullah Gansau, J. B. (2020). Exploring graduate employability in relation to their English language proficiency: A preliminary study. MANU: Jurnal Pusat Penataran Ilmu dan Bahasa, 31(2), 245–255. https://doi.org/10.51200/manu.v31i2.2856
Kaplan, R. B., Baldauf, R. B., Jr., & Kamwangamalu, N. (2011). Why educational language plans sometimes fail. Current Issues in Language Planning, 12(2), 105–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2011.591716
Karim, A., Kabilan, M. K., Ahmed, Z., Reshmin, L., & Rahman, M. M. (2023). The medium of instruction in Bangladeshi higher education institutions: Bangla, English, or both? Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 22(3), 232–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2020.1871353
Karim, A., Kabilan, M. K., Rahman, S., Shahed, F. H., & Rahman, M. M. (2021). Revisiting the high-profile English in Action teacher professional development program in Bangladesh: Promises, prospects, and eventualities. MEXTESOL Journal, 45(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.61871/mj.v45n2-6
Khan, M. S. H., Salele, N., Hasan, M., & Abdou, B. O. (2023). Factors affecting student readiness towards OBE implementation in engineering education: Evidence from a developing country. Heliyon, 9(10), Article e20905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20905
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
Macaro, E., Curle, S., Pun, J., An, J., & Dearden, J. (2018). A systematic review of English medium instruction in higher education. Language Teaching, 51(1), 36–76. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444817000350
Milon, M. R. K., Imam, M. H., & Muhury, P. (2024). Transforming the landscape of higher education in Bangladesh: Teachers’ perspectives on implementing outcome-based education (OBE). ICRRD Journal, 5(2), 117–135. https://doi.org/10.53272/icrrd.v5i2.2
Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2015). Malaysia education blueprint 2015–2025 (higher education). Ministry of Education Malaysia.
Morgan, H. (2022). Conducting a qualitative document analysis. The Qualitative Report, 27(1), 64–77. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5044
Mufanti, R., Carter, D., & England, N. (2024). Outcomes-based education in Indonesian higher education: Reporting on the understanding, challenges, and support available to teachers. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 9, Article 100873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.100873
National Council of Teachers of English. (2014). Why class size matters today [Position statement]. https://ncte.org/statement/why-class-size-matters/
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
Paul, A. K. (2020). Integrating CALL into English language learning: Bangladeshi college students’ perceptions and challenges. Journal of English Education and Teaching, 4(4), 499–515. https://doi.org/10.33369/jeet.4.4.499-515
Popay, J., Roberts, H., Sowden, A., Petticrew, M., Arai, L., Rodgers, M., Britten, N., Roen, K., & Duffy, S. (2006). Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews: A product from the ESRC Methods Programme (Version 1). Lancaster University. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.1018.4643
Rafi, A. S. M., & Morgan, A.-M. (2022). Linguistic ecology of Bangladeshi higher education: A translanguaging perspective. Teaching in Higher Education, 27(4), 512–529. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2022.2045579
Rafi, A. S. M., & Morgan, A.-M. (2024). Translanguaging as a transformative act in a reading classroom: Perspectives from a Bangladeshi private university. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 23(4), 543–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2021.2004894
Rahman, K. A., Seraj, P. M. I., Hasan, M. K., Namaziandost, E., & Tilwani, S. A. (2021). Washback of assessment on English teaching-learning practice at secondary schools. Language Testing in Asia, 11, Article 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-021-00129-2
Rahman, M. M., & Hu, G. (2025). From hypernationalism to neoliberalism: A multi-level policy analysis of English medium instructional practices, management, and ideologies in Bangladeshi (private) higher education. English Today, 41(2), 137–142. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078424000221
Rahman, M. M., & Pandian, A. (2018). A critical investigation of English language teaching in Bangladesh: Unfulfilled expectations after two decades of communicative language teaching. English Today, 34(3), 43–49. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026607841700061X
Rahman, M. M., Islam, M. S., Karim, A., Chowdhury, T. A., Rahman, M. M., Seraj, P. M. I., & Singh, M. K. M. (2019). English language teaching in Bangladesh today: Issues, outcomes and implications. Language Testing in Asia, 9(1), Article 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-019-0085-8
Rahman, M. M., Singh, M. K. M., & Karim, A. (2020). Distinctive medium of instruction ideologies in public and private universities in Bangladesh. Asian Englishes, 22(2), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.2019.1666493
Rahman, M. M., Singh, M. K. M., & Pandian, A. (2018). Exploring ESL teacher beliefs and classroom practices of CLT: A case study. International Journal of Instruction, 11(1), 295–310. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11121a
Roshid, M. M., & Chowdhury, R. (2013). English language proficiency and employment: A case study of Bangladeshi graduates in the Australian employment market. Mevlana International Journal of Education, 3(1), 68–81. https://doi.org/10.13054/mije.13.06.3.1
Roshid, M. M., & Kankaanranta, A. (2025). English communication skills in international business: Industry expectations versus university preparation. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 88(1), 100–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294906231184814
Ruggiano, N., & Perry, T. E. (2019). Conducting secondary analysis of qualitative data: Should we, can we, and how? Qualitative Social Work, 18(1), 81–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325017700701
Sah, P. K. (2022). English medium instruction in South Asia’s multilingual schools: Unpacking the dynamics of ideological orientations, policy/practices, and democratic questions. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 25(2), 742–755. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2020.1718591
Sah, P. K., & Fang, F. (2025). Decolonizing English-medium instruction in the Global South. TESOL Quarterly, 59(1), 565–579. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3307
Saha, S., & Rahman, M. M. (2022). Translanguaging pedagogy in the EAP classroom of private universities in Bangladesh. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 22(17), 28–44. https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v22i17.5656
Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Sage.
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Socialist Republic of Vietnam. (2008). Decision No. 1400/QĐ-TTg approving the project “Teaching and learning foreign languages in the national education system, period 2008–2020”. Government of Vietnam.
Sultana, S., & Fang, F. (2024). English as the medium of instruction and mother-tongue-based translanguaging: Challenges and prospects for tertiary education in Bangladesh and China. International Journal of Educational Development, 104, Article 102951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2023.102951
Torraco, R. J. (2016). Writing integrative literature reviews: Using the past and present to explore the future. Human Resource Development Review, 15(4), 404–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484316671606
UNESCO Institute for Statistics. (2024). Pupil–teacher ratio, tertiary (SE.TER.ENRL.TC.ZS) [Data set]. World Bank Open Data. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SE.TER.ENRL.TC.ZS
University Grants Commission of Bangladesh. (2020). 46th annual report 2019. University Grants Commission of Bangladesh. https://ugc.portal.gov.bd
University Grants Commission of Bangladesh. (2025). List of universities in Bangladesh. University Grants Commission of Bangladesh. https://ugc.portal.gov.bd
Vietnam News. (2018, January 8). National foreign language project fails to fulfil targets. Vietnam News. https://vietnamnews.vn/society/420711/national-foreign-language-project-fails-to-fulfill-targets.html
Wall, D. (2005). The impact of high-stakes examinations on classroom teaching: A case study using insights from testing and innovation theory (Studies in Language Testing, Vol. 22). Cambridge University Press.
Wall, D., & Alderson, J. C. (1993). Examining washback: The Sri Lankan impact study. Language Testing, 10(1), 41–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229301000103
Whittemore, R., & Knafl, K. (2005). The integrative review: Updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(5), 546–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x
Yasmin, T., Islam, M. M., Hoque, M. S., Othman, W. M. B., Reza, M., & Al Murshidi, G. (2025). Speaking anxiety of tertiary-level learners of English in Bangladesh: An investigation into the predicaments and prospects. English Teaching & Learning, 49(1), 87–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42321-024-00165-0